| June 2007 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
It is all 'bout the
people: As GCSL celebrates its first year anniversary (see story
and photos below), I am in a reflective mood sitting in our Bulgari
Bali villa overlooking the Indian Ocean and recovering from Marina's
spectacular five course "Sweet 16" Birthday Italian dinner
with three of her...well, my...favorite friends - Mssrs. Dom, Montrachet
and Gaja! Quite an evening (even better story and photos below). Quite
a year. We started in Hong Kong with 11 good folk, who had worked together
as a team for many years, and we now have 15...rumor has it I will be
evicted soon to make way for more! Anguilla, Belize, Cook Islands, Samoa,
Singapore and Shanghai rushed in pretty quickly with our own offices
(not just licenses, albeit we now have 7 registered agent, trust and
insurance management licenses) and dedicated staff (you know, the people
who work for you full-time to make sure things get done for your clients).
Nevis will open in June. GCSL now has seven (soon to be eight) thriving
offices, approximately 40 full-time staff, approximately 2,000 structures
(companies, trusts, foundations, captives, funds and other special purpose
vehicles) and a lot of good memories of a whirlwind 12 months! Sitting
here watching the wind blow, I realize what I always knew - it is all
'bout the people. To all my "kids" (staff), partners, clients,
fiduciaries, bankers, lawyers, accountants, regulators, government officials,
Butch, Spike, Gina, Popeye and Caesar (our dogs), office management
and other service providers...I want to give my heartfelt, yippeee,
OkeyDokey thanks to all of you. Year 1 was a blast. Year 2 will see
GCSL rockin' the globe, providing a cost-effective and friendly service
to our clients, assisting the industry by managing the Asia Offshore
Association (see story below about Ho Chi Minh City in October), speaking
out about the wrongs we see in the industry (improper "transfer
fees" imposed by service providers who just can¡¦t
compete), saying good things about fiduciaries doing good things for
themselves and their clients and generally having fun! I feel like I
am 20 something again so be ready y'all because, as the song goes, "you
ain't seen nothing yet"! Onwards and upwards... |
![]() |
|
|
1ST YEAR ANNIVERSARY
WAS ALL SMILES, LAUGHS, SPICY FOOD AND WINE...JUST FOR A CHANGE An evening of private dining with spicy Sichuan fare and free-flowing wines set the stage for GCSL's 1st Year Anniversary Celebration. The evening became more fun as Karen, Jacqui, Susan and everyone else passed on finishing the last two bowls of some mouth-burning dish, sauce and all...despite a fairly large cash offer to the victor from Johnson and Tony. Smart ladies as not even Jack would take up the offer!!! No matter¡Koutstanding ladies and gents, outstanding!!!
|
|
Marina and I arrived at The Bulgari Bali (www.bulgariresorts.com) Friday afternoon after a typically pleasant flight on Cathay Pacific. Four days, a beautiful villa overlooking the Indian Ocean, ten hours of massages, excellent Italian and Indonesian food, an ocean of fine wines, great workouts and painful yoga...check out the photos ...they try, but do not do justice to this special place on the planet! |
|
Jack made a quick
visit to Shanghai to say hi to Johnson and a few of our clients and
colleagues. Things are happening at GCSL Shanghai. |
|
GCSL SAMOA GAL
IS SPORTY!!! |
| AOA HO CHI MINH
CITY, OCTOBER 31 TO NOVEMBER 2, 2007 The Asia Offshore Association is revving up its truly Vietnamese cycle-rickshaw for our next conference to be held at The Sheraton Saigon in Ho Chi Minh City from October 31 to November 2, 2007. We are especially honored to have Marshall Langer, an internationally renowned tax expert and member of The AOA Wise Men Committee, as our Keynote Speaker. We also are pleased to have AOA Global Advisory Committee Members Tran Anh Duc (Vietnam), Eric Baier (Austria) and Josh Bennett (USA) speaking on matters relevant to Vietnam and the international arena. We equally are excited to have Brett Ashton (Savills Vietnam) speaking about the booming Vietnam property market. The AOA Executive Committee has decided to have a "Trick or Treat" Opening Cocktail with special young guests from the Christina Noble Ho Chi Minh City Orphanage. Please visit www.asiaoffshore.org to learn more about AOA Ho Chi Minh City - Back to Saigon. |
| AOA WWW SITE The Asia Offshore Association is back online with a new look, new functionality, new Executive, Global Advisory and Wise Men Committees. The new Members Only section will be sure to please as it will include articles, country updates and more for our loyal members. Please visit www.asiaoffshore.org for a browse!!! And smile as you no doubt conclude that "Jack's secret weapon" (aka Marina) is the true brains and heart behind the AOA and its new WWW site. |
![]() |
|
|
PRE-IMMIGRATION
TAX PLANNING
The Tax obligation on worldwide income is often an unpleasant surprise to the uninformed immigrant. However, for those who have the foresight and good advice to plan before immigrating to the US, and possibly even for those who did not, current law affords significant planning opportunities. The U.S tax code treats a foreign trust established by a Citizen or Resident Alien as a "grantor trust", meaning that it is transparent for income tax purposes; all trust activity must be reported annually, on Forms 3520 and 3520A, and all trust income is currently taxed. Failure to file timely the required reports carries serious civil and possibly criminal penalties. However, a Non-Resident Alien, at least five years prior to immigration, might create a discretionary trust in his or her own country or in a low or no tax jurisdiction, to hold assets for investment and for future distributions to U.S. beneficiaries. The Trust must be drafted to meet both foreign and U.S. criteria. If the five year rule is not met, the new resident will be treated as if the assets were transferred into trust on the date U.S. residency commenced, resulting in grantor trust treatment, and therefore to current tax and reporting requirements. The immigrant may become a US resident without the knowledge or time to take advantage of the five-year rule. There may nevertheless still be some planning opportunities. As an example, the new Resident Alien may have a wealthy family living outside the US, with the desire to establish a foreign Trust for the benefit of the US residents. For example, a foreign Trust established by a foreign Trustor, and which is revocable by that Trustor, could, if it meets other requirements, qualify to make tax-exempt distributions to US beneficiaries. The US beneficiaries must not have any direct ownership or control over the Trustee's discretion to make Trust distributions. However, the receipt by Citizens or Resident Aliens of funds or assets from a foreign trust are reportable, even if not taxable. Any foreign Trust, foreign or domestic, must be considered as part of overall estate planning and should provide for alternatives in the event of the death of the primary US beneficiaries. The U.S. Resident Alien can receive monetary gifts from foreign sources. While such direct gifts are not subject to US tax, the new rules require that gifts from foreign sources be reported on Form 3520 with annual tax returns. The reporting required for foreign gifts is much less extensive than that required for foreign Trusts, and does not require the taxpayer to reveal the identity of the individual donor of the gift. Partnerships or corporations, or an "intermediary" for such entity, must however be specifically identified. The IRS reserves the right to require the beneficiary to reveal the identity of an individual donor. The IRS reporting form excludes reporting of annual gifts from foreign individuals under $100,000 from foreign individuals or estates. Unlike U.S. Citizens, the Resident Alien may be in a position to avoid estate tax on assets located outside the U.S. if he or she (or the estate) can establish that the U.S. is not the country of domicile, The U.S. estate tax is based on the concept of domicile, and not on Citizenship. The long term Resident Alien will have to plan in advance to establish foreign domicile, which the U.S. regulations define generally as the place where the Resident Alien intends to eventually return to as a permanent abode. IRS regulations provide some guidance as to requirements to establish a foreign domicile, and each country has its own definitions and requirements, but it must be emphasized that advance planning is critical. The Resident Alien with a foreign domicile will pay U.S. income taxes, but all foreign assets could be excluded from estate taxes on death, particularly important since the Resident Alien will be denied the estate tax exemption available to Citizens if the beneficiary is not a Citizen, including the surviving spouse. The benefits of foreign trusts for asset protection are beyond the scope of this article, but in the litigious US, sheltering assets from potential business and personal creditors is often of primary concern. Neither a foreign Trustee nor a foreign Trust with US beneficiaries is subject to the jurisdiction of US courts. Furthermore, many offshore jurisdictions have laws which effectively preclude a creditor from reaching the assets even if the creditor were willing to undertake the expense and uncertainty of bringing legal action in that country. Several "tax-haven" countries have adopted extremely short time periods ("statutes of limitation"), some as short as one year, after which a creditor can not reach assets transferred to a Trust regardless of "fraud" as defined in various US statutes. It should be noted that most countries will not protect assets derived though criminal conduct, although tax avoidance may not be included in that category. To be effective, the foreign Trust must preclude the US person's control over Trust assets. This section on tax planning is only an overview and brief summary of a complex area of United States law. Nothing in this article should be considered legal advice, and interested persons are advised to consult qualified advisors. US tax law is subject to frequent change and interpretation. Contributed
by Stephen A. Malley, Law Offices of Stephen A. Malley |
||
![]() |
|
|
CARBON
EMISSIONS: TRADING HOT AIR TO SAVE OUR PLANET? The solution agreed by governments within the Kyoto Protocol was a carbon emissions reduction system which empowers governments to setup national carbon emission reduction schemes. Under such schemes, businesses that emit less pollutants are granted Certified Emissions Reductions ("Carbon Credits"). Businesses that pollute more than their limits will be required to pay financially by buying Carbon Credits for "the right to pollute". Therefore, a secondary market has developed for trading of Carbon Credits based on free market principles. Financial markets have been quick to adopt secondary market trading of Carbon Credits. Nordpool in Europe and Climate Exchange in Chicago cater to participants and investors that trade Carbon Credits as a financial instrument. Hong Kong is a perfect place to create a Carbon Credits market for Asia as Hong Kong already has a pilot emissions trading scheme with thermal power plants in the Pearl River Delta Region. Emerging markets account for much higher volumes of Carbon Credits compared with the rest of the world. China now accounts for 43% of total Carbon Credits registered at the UN, while India accounts for 12.11%. Global Carbon Credit trading is big business. According to the World Bank, trading volume rose from US$11 billion in 2005 to over US$30 billion last year. Investment banks and hedge funds have seen the potential in Carbon Credit trading in China and India. GCSL recently assisted
a client to setup the Mandarin Global Carbon Fund (the "Fund").
The Fund was setup specifically for acquisition of surplus Carbon Credits
in China. The Fund manager commented that "There is tremendous
arbitrage opportunity since the acquisition cost of Carbon Credits is
lower in China than in Europe. We believe the fund can capitalize on
the opportunity of lower abatement costs and wide availability of surplus
credits in China which are globally tradable." Contributed
by Tony Chan, General Manager - Fiduciary Services, GCSL Hong Kong |
|
US$1.1BN IN HONG
KONG IPO Contributed
by Tony Chan, General Manager - Fiduciary Services, GCSL Hong Kong |
|
KEEPING IT COMPLIANT...THE
GCSL WAY I know absolutely NONE of these compliance issues interests the readers of our newsletter at all and so I give you the tourist run-down on each of the locations. While I am not as extensive a traveler as Mr. J.W Flader Jr., my passport is close to three quarters full now and the Boss does have a few years on me.
Carlo, Carlyle and Vance made great tour guides (as Puai Wichman does in my past visits to the Cook Islands and Samoa) and I am sure all will extend their local expertise to anyone contemplating a trip to their fabulous Islands (or yes Carlo, "lands" in Belize's case). Thanks guys for your hospitality and chaperoning. No such incidents as last year when Puai allowed me to fall victim to a large manhole in Samoa's main drag strip in the wee small hours. Contributed
by Cathy Odgers, Group Legal Counsel and Compliance Officer, GCSL Hong
Kong. |
![]() |
|
|
TAME
THE DRAGON Ride the dragon Using an offshore IBC or limited company as a vehicle for holding shares is quite common. There are no capital gains taxes or taxes on dividends in Hong Kong or in the offshore jurisdiction. The Anguilla IBC or Samoa LLC offers a "cheap and cheerful" vehicle for such investments. Local brokers are fine with opening brokerage accounts for offshore companies and many retail banks will facilitate bank accounts without the need of the owner coming to Hong Kong. Trade the silk
route Setting up a Hong Kong limited company is an excellent start to a trading business. Although more expensive and subject to greater statutory requirements than offshore companies, the Hong Kong company limited by shares is a well accepted trading entity by local, Chinese and international trading partners. Corporate profits tax in Hong Kong is relatively low at 17.5% and is only assessed on profits derived from doing business in Hong Kong. Therefore, as long as the company can evidence that there profits are not derived from doing business in Hong Kong, the company will not pay any profits tax. Trade facilitated by the company directly between China and foreign countries can be claimed as "offshore income" and not subject to profits tax. Hong Kong banks offer excellent online banking services for trading companies and also extend a range of trade related services for the larger clients. Enter the dragon Offshore companies used for business in China are also common. Companies incorporated in Hong Kong, Singapore, Anguilla, Belize, Samoa and other similar jurisdictions are increasingly popular as investment holding companies. The Samoa International Company is popular as it can have all incorporation documents in Chinese and has unlimited share capital without additional government fees. Further, these documents can be notarized, apostiled and then legalized by the China embassy in Samoa. In addition, a growing number of the larger international banks in China will open bank accounts for offshore companies. Exit the dragon Tony Chan, General Manager - Fiduciary Services, GCSL Hong Kong |
| CHINA'S LEGAL
SYSTEM IN TRANSITION China's economy and legal system has developed significantly during the last 30 years. An increasingly robust National People's Congress and its Standing Committee have enacted extensive legislation on topics in virtually all areas. These laws have been supplemented by myriad regulations of the State Council, China's leading executive institution, and the central ministries and commissions under it, as well as provincial and local people's congresses and governments. The Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procurate are both now vigorous organizations, albeit, like the State Council, they are subordinate to the National People's Congress. All have issued "interpretations" and other documents, either separately or with each other and with other agencies, that are the substantive equivalent of supplementary legislation. China also has concluded with other governments a large number of bilateral agreements dealing with the domestic legal system and now adheres to many multilateral treaties concerned with international business law and human rights. China now has a nationwide court system including over 3,000 basic courts and almost 200,000 judges. The task of forging this huge and inexperienced group, originally staffed mostly by former military and police officers without legal education but now increasingly recruited from law school graduates, into professionally competent, honest, impartial and independent decision-makers is formidable. FOREIGN BANKS'
BUSINESS IN CHINA TO GROW BY 20% IN 2007 TRADE SURPLUS
KEEPS GROWING CRAZY TURNOVER
IN CHINA'S STOCK MARKETS CHINA MAY TRIPLE
QFII QUOTA TO US$30 BILLION PROPERTY DEVELOPERS
LOOK OVERSEAS FOR FINANCING CHINA TRUST LAW "Article 2:
Trust in this Law refers to the act in which the trustor, on the basis
of confidence on the trustee, entrusts certain property rights it owns
to the trustee and the trustee manages or disposes of the property rights
in its own name in accordance with the intentions of the trustor and
for the benefit of the beneficiary or for specific purposes." Articles 11 and 12 indicates that if the trust is established for the purpose of defrauding a specific creditor, then the trust shall be deemed void and creditor will have one year to exercise his/her rights against the trust property. Of equal interest there are no articles or regulations addressing the tax implications of settling a trust. A point of interest, of course, is that China presently does not have inheritance tax. Contributed
by Johnson Chien, General Manager - Fiduciary Services, GCSL Hong Kong
|
![]() |
|
|
SINGAPORE: A NEW RACE IN TOWN Except that this time, the action is taking place around the Marina Bay area, whizzing by local landmarks such as the Esplanade and City Hall and the Supreme Court in the small republic of Singapore. It's now official, after months of speculation - Singapore will host a leg of the Grand Prix circuit next year, with a race to be held in September or early October 2008. Significantly, the race could well be a first in the 60-year history of Formula One in that the race will likely be held at night. With the Singapore Grand prix, Singapore will host one of only three street races on the calendar for next year, joining the prestigious ranks of Monaco and Valencia. Singapore's five-year deal to stage the race, with an option for a five-year extension, is a partnership between Formula One Management boss Bernie Ecclestone and Singapore entrepreneur Ong Beng Seng. However, the Singapore Government will finance approximately 60% of the cost of staging the race each year, which can reach S$150 million (approximately US$75 million). Night or day, hosting the event brings Singapore untold benefits. As the race continues for the Singapore government to raise her profile as great place to work and play, this race will draw the usual suspects not only in participants but also in the well-heeled spectators. This event would also augur well for the spanking new super yacht marina at Sentosa where many a rich expatriate or investor already play. In fact, just two weeks ago, a 150-foot £á30 million super luxurious super yacht sailed into Singapore to attract the serious sailors here. As the Singapore
race continues, the Singapore Grand Prix will be yet another important
feather in the republic's cap. Contributed
by Lawrence Fong, Managing Director, GCSL Singapore |
![]() |
|
|
ANGUILLA'S
IMMOBILIZATION OF BEARER SHARES REGIME - A PRACTICAL AND REGULATORY
SOUND APPROACH In this month's newsletter, I wish to discuss the thinking of the Commission in so advising the Governor and, in the interest of transparency, to disclose that I was involved in this process of drafting and advising on these regulations in my former position as Deputy Director of the Commission. The central idea of the Regulations was to achieve the basic objective of ensuring that bearer shares were immobilized, in other words the shares have to be maintained by a custodian, while at the same time doing it in such a manner that it would not be burdensome or impact negatively on service providers specifically or the industry in general. To accomplish this, the Commission decided that all current and future licensees under the Trust Companies and Offshore Banking Act 2000 (TCOBA) and the Company Management Act 2000 (CMA) would automatically qualify as custodians. In addition, overseas agents of licensees of these two Acts would also qualify. To further expand the definition of the term custodian, the Commission added two categories, i.e. a) a foreign regulated person and b) a "catch-all" category that of being anyone who is designated as a custodian in writing by the Commission. This means that even if a person does not hold a licence under the TCOBA and CMA, or is not an overseas agent of such a person, or is not a foreign regulated person, that person can still be designated as a custodian if it meets criteria set by the Commission and the designation is made so in writing. To date, no criteria has been published to determine how the Commission would address this last category of applicant but it is certain that such applications would be assessed on a case by case basis. The phrase "foreign regulated person" will be discussed and defined in a subsequent newsletter article since that in itself warrants a separate analysis. However, it is worth pointing out that irrespective of which category the custodian falls under, that designation is void if the person does not have under its direct control facilities for the safekeeping in custody of bearer shares which are satisfactory to the Commission. The transition period for all bearer shares to be immobilized is the 31st December 2009, thus meaning that registered agents have until then to ensure that companies for which they provide this service to complies with the Regulations. The Regulations specify the conduct that should occur in relation to bearer shares. Where an IBC issues such a share on or after 30th June 2006, the IBC cannot deliver the share to any person other than to a custodian who has agreed to hold the share. Where the share is an existing share, the IBC shall on or before the 31st December, deposit it with a custodian who has agreed to hold the share or convert it or exchange it for a registered share. Of course, if the share is cancelled or redeemed, purchased or otherwise acquired by the IBC as a treasury share, this does not apply. A custodian shall within a period of 14 days of receipt of a bearer share send a written notification to the registered agent of the IBC, stating that it is the custodian of the share that has been delivered to it or deposited with in and that the custodian has identified the beneficial owner of the share and that it has entered into a custody agreement with the beneficial owner of the share. Further, where a custodian desires to cease to act as a custodian in respect of a bearer share of an IBC or ceases to be a custodian, it shall give the registered agent of the IBC and the beneficial owner of the share, written notice of its intention to cease acting as a custodian in respect of the share; but if the custodian is the registered agent of the company, it shall give such notice to the beneficial owner only. Bearer shares are disabled for any period during which they are held by a person other than a custodian except with respect to an existing share until such share has been placed into custody after the end of the transition period; the share is held by the company provided that the company does not hold it for or on behalf of any other person or the bearer share is to be or has been converted to or exchanged for a registered share; redeemed, purchased or otherwise acquired or cancelled or forfeited. GCSL Anguilla does not have any IBCs with bearer shares, and actively discourages their use. However, it is worth noting that we stand ready to comply with the new Regulations. Contributed
by Carlyle Rogers, Managing Director, GCSL Anguilla
|
|
SAMOA
OPPOSES UNFAIR TREATMENT OF OFFSHORE JURISDICTIONS IN STOP TAX HAVENS
ABUSE BILL As we celebrated our independence, we look across to one of the most developed democracies in the world, the USA, and find that their legislators are proposing laws which are dictatorial and most unfair. There are two bills being introduced, which if enacted, would among other things undermine USA competitiveness, create discriminatory black lists (which clearly is a hangover from the now discredited OECD Harmful Tax Competition Initiative) and violates USA trade obligations. One such bill is the Dorgan Bill, which targets American companies operating in selected low tax jurisdictions, such as Samoa, and strips away their ability to postpone the imposition of a second layer of tax on their foreign sourced income. More startling is the Stop Tax Havens Abuse Bill, which provides for a blacklisting of offshore jurisdictions which seeks to expand the ability of the USA to secure information exchange. The effect is to ultimately discourage and penalize USA citizens from engaging in various economic activities with offshore jurisdictions including Samoa (this affects those who shares are not traded on a recognized stock exchange), if such persons are unable to rebut a presumption that such activity was in the furtherance of tax evasion, securities fraud or money laundering. Not only is there an arbitrary blacklist, but the Bill creates a presumption that the USA person is engaged in tax evasion, securities fraud or money laundering via the listed offshore jurisdictions. For a jurisdiction to be exonerated from this Bill, they are to have a treaty or information exchange with the USA, which provides for "prompt, obligatory and automatic exchange of information". What most people may not know is this is the same sort of information exchange protocol that the EU has been trying to get the USA to agree to, but without much success. It appears that for Senators Levin, Coleman and Obama, automatic exchange of information is acceptable only if it facilitates an inward flow of information. The response by the Government of Samoa is to lobby through Samoa's Mission to the United Nations in New York, as well as seek assistance from Congressman of American Samoa, Faleomavaega Eni Hunkin. Samoa is actively joining the chorus of nations that believe such legislation is harmful to the USA and the global economy.
Contributed by Laura Fepuleai, Manager, GCSL Samoa |
|
BELIZE: TRUST
AND SERVICE PROVIDERS LEGISLATION
These are some of the basic due diligence requirements of Service Providers in Belize. However, there are other requirements found in Section 6, which looks at "corporate governance". The following matters are raised by that section:
Those are the obligations
and requirements that Service Providers are supposed to show that they
are in compliance with. On another note, on Friday the 25th May 2007, the National Assembly passed into law a bill requiring the mandatory registration of trusts as well as the creation of a Trust Registry. This will be a properly manned Registry, overseen by the International Financial Services Commission, and the details of the Registry operation will become more transparent soon. I will make it at least part of the subject of next month's Belize report, as these are interesting times in Belize. In keeping with that theme, "interesting times", I wanted to comment on the recent demonstrations which took place in Belize. The Government here wished to take on, as a sovereign guarantor, responsibility for the loan of a private hospital, which was unable to pay its debts but could still function as a viable entity otherwise (is that possible??). The government did this, but without the knowledge of some members of the cabinet, and this drew the wrath of the opposition, to the point where supporters of both parties found themselves outside the building of the National Assembly. There were reports of some stones being thrown, and the police eventually had to disperse the crowd with teargas. I was asked if this would negatively impact on the trust and company formation industry that is slowly becoming a part of the Belizean economic landscape. To that I answer no, and here is why. Take a look at any well respected democracy today, and you will see a country where in very recent times there have been demonstrations, sometimes ending in violence, sometimes not. In the 1960s, the United States had race riots. Did we see the downfall of the US economy? Certainly not. Just a few months ago, there was a serious march, in Los Angeles and in New York, concerning the Immigration Bill which was then being debated. Did we see the downfall of the US economy. Again, certainly not. There have been times when serious damage has resulted due to demonstrations, but again, the economies in which these demonstrations have occurred have continued to survive, and in fact thrive, in some cases. The same thing with Belize. In fact, I looked on the entire episode with great joy, because although there was some violence, with stone throwing and the tear gas, what eventually occurred was that there was such widespread opposition to the proposed loan guarantee placed before the National Assembly, that it was finally removed by the Prime Minister. I was happy, not because of the removal of the loan, but because it was an expression of political maturity on the part of the people, who stood their ground and ensured that their political representatives heard their voice. With some of the wars being waged in the world today, and what we hear on the news, some folks in other countries can't seem to get their leaders to hear them. We here in Belize are happy because we have seen an exercise in true democracy, where the majority voice their view, and the leaders have to listen. How more democratic could life get?! You gotta Belize it!!!
Contributed by Carlo Mason, Managing Director, GCSL Belize |
|
COOK ISLANDS
- A NOT SO KNOWN MUTUAL FUNDS JURISDICTION An International Company is the most commonly used vehicle for the establishment of a mutual fund. The advantages of using an International Company is that it allows for a flexible capital structure, very strong confidentiality provisions (there is no requirement for a public record of shareholders) and, for those who already administer mutual funds, there is minimal on-going administrative requirements which translates into minimal costs. Make no mistake, mutual funds are subject to the due diligence requirements of the Cook Islands, but what is remarkable is the relative ease with which mutual funds can be established and administered in the Cook Islands, compared with other more high profile jurisdictions. There are some interesting administrative provisions in the Cook Islands legislation, which makes this jurisdiction attractive for this type of business. For example a registered company auditor is required to be appointed within 90 days of incorporation, but there is no requirement to file audited accounts with the Registrar. There are many other advantages provided for under the International Companies Act of the Cook Islands. Flexibility in the corporate structure and ease of administration extends to the mechanical aspects of share redemptions. For example, shares may be redeemed at the request of the shareholder at prices based upon the net asset value or any other calculation if prescribed in the Company's Articles of Association. It is possible to create a mutual fund which is closed-ended at the outset, but which will become open-ended at a future date by the happening of a specific event. There are no restrictions on how a mutual fund can be structured - so long as compliant with Cook Islands law. Where there is a public offering of shares, then a prospectus must be approved. However, where a prospectus is registered in an approved jurisdiction for the purpose of raising money from the public in that jurisdiction, it is unnecessary for the prospectus to be approved in the Cook Islands so long as a copy of the prospectus is filed with the Registrar within 28 days of registration or filing in the approved jurisdiction. Approved stock exchanges include Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Singapore, Taiwan, Malaysia, Thailand and the USA. The Registrar has the power to extend the list of approved jurisdictions. Where there is no offer of shares to the public, there are no statutory rules or regulations governing the content of offering documents. However, at GCSL, we will insist that measures are taken to ensure that the offering documents make fair and adequate disclosure of all facts, which are likely to influence investors. Of course, it goes without saying that an International Company is exempt from any form of taxation in the Cook Islands including stamp duty, capital gain tax, capital duty, and withholding tax. The fact is that the Cook Islands is a jurisdiction waiting to be discovered for its mutual funds business with services to match any other more well-known mutual funds jurisdictions. At GCSL, we have the infrastructure and the know how to set up a mutual fund for your clients at very competitive costs. Contributed by Puai Wichman,
Managing Director, GCSL Cook Islands |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
The things that make us smile, frown and generally make life interesting... OUR
MONTHLY QUOTE THAT MADE US SMILE PREGNANCY SYMPATHY
SUIT!? CONGESTION PRICING...AT
US$8 PER DAY, IT WON'T STOP THE INVESTMENT BANKERS A TAXING PROBLEM...UNLESS
YOU HAVE SQUILLIONS FOR THE MUSICIANS
OUT THERE
GETTING BEAT...WE
LOVE TO LAUGH AT OURSELVES |
|
The contents of the Global Consultants and Services Ltd's ("GCSL") Newsletter is for reference purposes only, and is provided by GCSL as a complimentary service. We have reviewed many different publications to compile this information, and we recommend that readers conduct due diligence before acting on any opinions mentioned herein. GCSL, its directors, officers, shareholders, employees, affiliates and agents do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any information made available herein. In accordance with the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, Chapter 486, of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, we hereby inform you that we will discontinue sending our newsletter to you in the event you request we do the same. |
![]() |