| December 2007 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
I started writing while attending the International Tax Planning Association conference in Hong Kong with a spectacular first night cocktail at The Box and this happened. We followed up that evening with a wine dinner at Harlan's with 30 great people from the ITPA and this happened. I thought I might get some work done in Nevis, but I started writing while sitting on the patio at our Mt. Nevis Hotel room and this happened.
Then I started again in Miami, but this happened at the first of my 45th birthday party celebrations.
Alas, I started again in Copenhagen, but, well, this happened at the next of my 45th birthday party celebrations.
And I finally finished in London where, well, nothing happened. Happy birthday to me Onwards and upwards... |
![]() |
|
The AOA has many plans for 2008 including the following:
|
![]() |
|
|
CAPITAL CONTROLS STILL WREAKING HAVOC The purpose of the controls is to stem the strengthening of the Thai Baht, but a byproduct has been to make certain types of common transactions between Thailand and offshore parties much more troublesome. The capital controls include something that has become widely known as the “30% Rule”. The 30% Rule states that for certain transactions in which parties in Thailand receive a loan or investment from parties offshore, 30% of the amount received by the Thailand party is required to be deposited with the Bank of Thailand, interest free, for a period of one year. This rule has really disrupted the market because it applies to very common transactions such as loans from offshore to Thailand parties and the purchase of shares of Thailand companies which are not listed in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Loans From Offshore Parties Generally, if a Thailand party receives a loan from a party offshore and the proceeds of the loan are received in any currency other than Thai Baht, the 30% Rule applies. If so, the receiver’s bank in Thailand is required to deposit 30% of the total amount of the loan received with the Bank of Thailand, interest free, for a period on one year. For example, say a party in Hong Kong agrees to loan a party in Thailand USD100,000 at a 5% interest rate for a period of 5 years. Upon the Thailand party’s receipt of the USD100,000, the 30% Rule would apply. Accordingly, the Thailand party’s receiving bank would be required to deposit 30% of the amount received with the Bank of Thailand, interest free, for a period of one year. Exceptions In the above example the 30% Rule applies because the amount received by the Thailand party was in foreign currency, in that case US Dollars. If the Hong Kong lender would have instead purchased Thai Baht in Hong Kong and then transferred the Baht equivalent of the USD100,000 into Thailand the rule would not have applied. Also, if the Hong Kong lender would have entered into an arrangement with a Thailand bank to fully hedge the loan amount during the period of the loan the rule also would not have applied. A hedge in this case is an arrangement with a bank to lock in, in advance, the exchange rate to be used to purchase
Equity not listed on the SET Purchased by Offshore Parties The 30% Rule also applies when offshore parties purchase shares of Thailand registered companies. The rule applies to share purchases if the
For example, suppose a Japanese investor purchases a 5% of the total outstanding shares of a Thailand company for USD50,000. In this situation the rule would apply, therefore, the receiving bank would deposit 30% of the purchase price received with the Bank of Thailand, interest free, for a period of one year. Exceptions If the purchase price does not meet the equivalent of USD20,000 threshold the rule does not apply. If the purchase is for over 10% of the Thailand company’s total outstanding shares the rule does not apply. Suppose a Swedish investor purchases 11% of the total outstanding shares of a Thailand company for USD21,000. In this situation the rule would not apply because the percentage of total shares purchased exceeds 10%. Also, note that if the offshore party purchases Thai Baht offshore (which is normally much more expensive that purchasing Baht in Thailand) before he transfers the purchase price into Thailand the rule also does not apply. For example, suppose a French investor purchases 3% of the shares of a Thailand company for a purchase price of USD25,000. Here the rule would normally apply, however, in this situation the French investor purchases the Thai Baht equivalent of the USD25,000 offshore and transfers that amount to the seller in Thailand. Accordingly, the rule would not apply. Conclusion This rule causes problems and confusion in the above situations especially if the transaction parties had not already factored the rule into the deal from the very beginning. When the rule was first announced I had hoped that it would only be a temporary measure and there seems to be signs that the government may be planning to do away with the capital controls at the end of the year. However, until the government does so, the business community needs to keep these rules in mind when planning cross-border transactions. Contributed by Michael Doyle, Partner, Seri Manop & Doyle, Bangkok, Thailand |
![]() |
|
|
TOUGH TIMES FOR THE “NON-DOMS” As a result of these developments an increasing number of clients are now considering their options. Possible 'tax friendly' jurisdictions to move to are, for example, Monaco, Gibraltar, the Channel Islands, Dubai and Switzerland. Because of its, arguably, high quality of life and central location within Europe, Switzerland has considerable appeal. In Switzerland, subject to certain conditions, a foreign national who is not gainfully active in Switzerland can elect for a special tax regime whereby they are assessed to income and net wealth tax on a lump sum. This lump sum amount is related to the level of expenses and the lifestyle of the individual (e.g. housing, cars, boats, etc.) and in most Cantons this is based on the annual rental value of his or her home multiplied by five. The lump sum taxable amount can be negotiated in advance with the Cantonal tax authorities by way of a tax ruling. In most Cantons the minimum required taxable income varies between GBP 100,000 and GBP 175,000. The total annual Swiss tax burden for a lump sum tax payer will vary between GBP 45,000 and GBP 85,000 depending on the Canton and the facts and circumstances of the particular case. Under the lump sum taxation regime capital gains can in principle be realised without increasing the total Swiss tax due under the ruling. Income from Swiss sources and/or foreign income such as dividends, interest and royalties for which a reduction or exemption of foreign withholding tax is claimed may, however, increase the total Swiss tax due. In Switzerland gift and estate duties are only levied at a cantonal and communal level and most cantons and communes abolished gift and estate duties between spouses and between parents and children. In cantons where gift and estate duties are still levied, the applicable rates are generally quite low. Contributed by Miles Dean, International Fiscal Services, London |
![]() |
|
HOW TO MANAGE ASSETS THROUGH AN INTERNATIONAL TRUST? Using an international trust for investment purposes provides a number of financial opportunities, including investment diversification and estate planning. And if privacy is important, it can help keep prying eyes from knowing your every financial move, and is an excellent tool to obtain a high level of asset protection.
A USA citizen investing in their name is locked out of two-thirds of the world’s equity and bond investments. Foreign institutions often refuse to deal directly with U.S. citizens as a result of the U.S. Federal regulations imposed upon them. Alternatively, investing through an international trust opens the doors to quality investments throughout the world. You will still be subject to U.S. taxes and compliances issues, but diversification can be found. Naturally, you seek asset protection in a litigation-gone-mad-society. Using an international trust avails you to asset protection that is simply impossible to find at home…. offshore jurisdictions are second to none for outstanding wealth preservation. It is risky holding assets in your name. The better approach is to title assets in separate entities owned by an international trust you create, and then you use and control those entities. Placing the home in an LLC could effectively provide an opportunity for safeguarding the home and US$275,000 in equity from the failings of other investments and from personal lawsuits. Stocks, bonds and cash (US$225,000) and personal property (US$35,000) could be held in a “Nest Egg” LLC. As the LLC manager, you maintain management and control over the investment decisions. Great caution must be taken before transferring the US$150,000 tax-deferred savings into an entity, as this would probably trigger negative tax consequences. Sounds like you are complicating life when using an international trust? Not really. Once the trust is set up it is user friendly and the peace of mind in carefully protecting assets can not be over-emphasized. Once you gain more confidence in investing offshore, diversification and better yields are more easily realized. An added benefit is the trust agreement is a private document achieving greater levels of privacy. Integrating retirement planning, estate planning and asset protection into an international trust is part of the planning process. Naturally, the terms of the international trust must be carefully drafted and entity formalities must always be satisfied. And since planning structures can be ultimately challenged in a courtroom if you are sued, your planner should have courtroom savvy and planning should begin with these skills and objectives in mind. Contributed by David Tanzer, who is an international lawyer and author of How to Legally Protect Your Assets and Offshore Living & Investing located at www.DavidTanzer.com. |
CENTER FOR FREEDOM & PROSPERITY UPDATE These are troubling developments, particularly since tax competition has been a critical force for better economic policy. In the last 30 years top income tax rates in developed nations have been reduced by an average of 25 percentage points, corporate tax rates have dropped by 20 percentage points, and there are now more than 20 nations with low-rate flat tax systems. Simply stated, politicians around the world are being forced to do the right thing because they understand that capital can shift from high-tax to low-tax jurisdictions with relative ease. Over the coming months, the Center for Freedom and Prosperity will keep you up-to-date on the events on Capitol Hill as they pertain to the continued fight to preserve tax competition, financial privacy and fiscal sovereignty. Here is a brief update on the critical issues we are currently following. The two biggest threats are S. 681, introduced by Senator Levin of Michigan, and S. 396, introduced by Senator Dorgan of North Dakota. Both bills penalize Americans who invest in low-tax countries. Senator Dorgan's bill will cause American companies to lose market share, which will lead to a drop in jobs and exports. Senator Levin's legislation imposes taxes, regulations, and penalties on American individuals (and non-publicly traded companies) operating in targeted low-tax jurisdictions. Both bills would put American taxpayers at a competitive disadvantage by making it difficult to utilize low-tax jurisdictions when competing with taxpayers from other nations. But perhaps the worst part of the two bills is that it will be the first time the U.S. has blacklisted sovereign jurisdictions for their pro free-market tax policies. I am glad to report that both bills are still locked in committee and we hope that our aggressive educational campaign will keep them there. Next month we will report on a potentially biased World Bank study on the "development impact of off-shore financial centers." As you can see, we have a tough battle ahead. Enemies of tax competition and economic liberty are lining up proposals that would undermine freedom and prosperity. In the face of these serious threats, we will remain vigilant. Contributed by Andy Quinlan, President and co-founder of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity and the CF&P Foundation (www.freedomandprosperity.org). |
WHEN SWEET CHARITY GOES SOUR Spending many years creating wealth, it takes a completely different mindset to then turn and give it all away or advise your clients on how to do likewise. As you sit at a meeting you might feel pans of nauseousness as the client wishes to outline their plan to now effectively throw away everything that you may have spent the past 10 or 15 years help to create. The client is now asking you to act as a politician would in a Socialist government and give away everything that has been produced. Philanthropic giving has sustained new zest as high profilers such as Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey and Ted Turner publicly break down their fortunes and seem to work just as hard to give away their wealth as they did to make it. They do so with such hoopla attached that you can only conclude that they have a guilt complex about their wealth in the first instance. They are trying to inspire others to do likewise, such stupidity as "if everyone gave $100 then...". the point being of course, that not everyone is worth the hundred's of millions or billions that they are. Yes, the rich loud hailing Charitable givers should go away and sit somewhere quietly and leave the rest of us to get on with it. Especially Bono. My personal experience of Charitable trusts has always been to set them up for clever and intricate taxation planning purposes, never anticipating that one day wealth would be distributed through them. There are 4,400 charities registered with the Hong Kong IRD, over 200,000 in the UK. Don't be fooled, their motives are just the same as any business. Their profit comes in the form of making people feel good. We all do things that we necessarily would not otherwise do either for love or money. It is quite simple. Public Charitable giving is done as a way of buying love from others. Even in the most middle class of family, there now exists a generational gap with the baby boomer 50-60 year olds out there having collected serious amounts of wealth. Those of us in our 20's and 30's face increased costs of living compared to our salaries or income capacity, student loans, increasing health costs and tax burdens from the "ageing generation" above us. Basic housing is becoming more unaffordable than ever and yet baby boomers seem happy to give away their money to charity. It is little wonder that the youth of today have such a "live for the now" mentality. We know that being rich and 60 is a whole lot less fun than being 20 or 30 and being able to do the same sorts of things that the baby boomers are now enjoying. Charitable giving has been kick-started by a worldwide guilt complex about wealth. Charity is a huge industry in itself. Most major Charitable organizations have CEO's and are run along a corporate model. They carefully orchestrate guilt in the giving, using images of starving children, third world poverty and desperation for their own means. These Charities cream off the top and give to schemes that are continuing to be labeled as cronyism and inefficient. Charities are starting to be monitored more closely and scams uncovered by watchful media. Where does the money actually go? The biggest scammers by far are Green groups. Green groups especially have pushed so hard that they have created enough collective guilt that the world is seriously introducing carbon credits and emissions trading schemes, or as we call it in New Zealand "Fart tax". Such an abstract concept that is scientifically not an absolute. When you are sitting in 5 degree Celsius temperatures at 6am on a motorbike trying to get animals into a yard to be milked or sheared, there is not one New Zealand farmer who does not think that warming their part of the globe could possibly be a good thing. New Zealand has to under the Kyoto protocol pay for CO2 emissions produced not by large dirty manufacturing plants, but by cute fluffy animals on large green fields. China has an exemption to Kyoto as apparently it is not "developed" enough and actually outnumbers New Zealand in terms of sheep, 290 million to 45 million. Yet New Zealand warmists won out and the government aims to "lead the world" in climate change. Totally inconceivable for a country with 4 million people! Fortunately New Zealand has lost every major sporting competition this year so will no doubt fail in climate change as well. Al Gore travels the world speaking about inconvenient truths. That's right, by jet. Great Australian golfer Greg Norman is a Qantas ambassador for their guilt program of carbon credit offloading. Norman (assuming he kept it in his recent divorce proceedings) owns his own jet. John Travolta likewise. The hypocrisy of "do as I say not as I do" is extreme. I like air travel. I pay large money to do so. I pay so many taxes to jurisdictions in which I travel to, I ask - haven't I already paid for everything? Green groups are also responsible for the push towards such nonsense as paying for plastic bags at supermarkets. I was asked after paying $HK90 (US$12) for a small container or washing liquid at one of the local expatriate haunted Hong Kong supermarkets whether I would like to voluntarily pay another HK50 cents for the bag. The answer of course was a giant "no" and an explanation that the margin on the liquid should more than cover the very small cost of the biodegradable plastic bag which caused no damage to the environment at all as it was biodegradable as was the liquid that I had just purchased. And where do the profits go from the suckers who part with the 50 cents? Anywhere but to help the environment obviously as the building which houses the supermarket is notorious for being one of the coldest in Hong Kong all year round thanks to Antarctica air conditioning temperatures. Yes, down with the high taxing, big spending warmists I say. And I shall not voluntarily give $1 towards those who espouse global warming to be evil. It simply is not. I like warm weather. How many people do you know step outside and say "I wish it was so cold I needed a coat"? Cold weather requires fires and heaters for humans to survive. Pollution is the cost of civilisation. Warmists would have us go back to cave times, but without the fires. There is nothing wrong with legitimate charitable causes, but what should be of more concern to authorities than any tax planning that charities in the past may have allegedly created, is the new age fraud of the charity itself. In effect Charities are privatizing government's primary role and the bumper sticker mantra "Don't Steal - The Government Hates Competition" is more relevant than ever. Contributed by Cathy Odgers, Group Legal Counsel, GCSL Hong Kong |
![]() |
|
The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority's (Adia) acquisition of a 4.9% stake in Citigroup is expected to trigger further acquisitions by Gulf-based investors in USA banking assets. A number of leading USA banks' shares suffered heavy losses following the sub-prime crisis, making them attractive investment targets for cash-rich Gulf investors. The turmoil in the markets and the sub-prime mortgage mess has made large American financial institutions and banks vulnerable. With Adia picking up a substantial stake in Citigroup, analysts said Dubai-based government-owned funds are likely to move in quickly and pick up stakes in major US institutions such as Merrill Lynch, Bear Sterns or Morgan Stanley. Valuation is the key motivator in most of these investment decisions. Analysts have indicated that although attractive valuations are a major factor, political pressure on Gulf investors, particularly the sovereign wealth funds, could result in their opting for Asia and other emerging markets against the USA and western markets. Contributed
by Elie Sfeir, General Manager - Fiduciary Services, GCSL Hong Kong |
![]() |
|
|
The Government recently announced a further cut in Hong Kong's already famously low tax rates. From the 2007/08 financial year, the top rate for salaries tax will be 15%, while businesses will pay no more than 16.5% in profits tax. |
![]() |
|
|
LAND GRABS STILL ALL THE RAGE DANONE WINS ONE AS BVI COURT FREEZES WAHAHA ASSETS AIRLINE FUEL SURCHARGE RAISED PETROCHINA NUMBER ONE PROPERTY PRICE RISE 9.5% DESPITE CONSTRAINT MEASURES HAIER CONTINUES TO EXPAND OVERSEAS PRIVATE ENTERPRISES IN FULL SWING IN CHINA ARE YOU READY FOR CHINA IN 2008 The new enterprise income tax law was issued in March 2007 to unify the income tax treatment of domestic and foreign enterprises with a flat income tax rate of 25%. Therefore the enjoyment of zero tax incentives will no longer apply. In addition, the test of effective management or “the residence test” is also included in the new income tax law. (Currently, Chinese tax authority only adopts the place of incorporation test). This new residence concept will have significant Impact to certain categories of foreign enterprises which include the so called “Tax haven” enterprises owned by Chinese nationals or by foreign nationals or enterprises, which are managed to some extent from China. Another issue is the withholding tax on the dividend, interest and royalty income that derives from China. At present, China does not impose any withholding tax on dividends and only 10% on interest and royalty income. Whether or not this arrangement will remain unchanged is in the hands of China State Council. However, the direction of applying 20% withholding tax on such income is expected. Therefore, it is likely many foreigners will chang the shareholding structure of China Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprises and Joint Ventures to a jurisdiction that has double tax agreement, i.e. Hong Kong. The other “watch out” point is the new Chinese labor law. Some lawyers call it the “Labor Contract Law - LCL”. The ultimate goal of this new law is to protect the right of employees and consequently the life of the employer more difficult. With this new labor law, no matter how few employees a company has, it still must ensure that its employment practices comply with the new law, otherwise significant penalties will be applied. A brief summary of the important points are below.
Contributed
by Johnson Chien, General Manager - Fiduciary Services, GCSL Shanghai |
![]() |
|
|
SINGAPORE CAN BE GATEWAY TO SOUTHEAST ASIA FOR ISRAEL Speaking at the Israel Pavilion, Ms Anat Katz, commercial attaché at the Israeli embassy, said both countries are small nations and have no natural resources. She added that Singapore can act as the gateway to South-east Asia for Israeli companies as both countries have much in common. Ms Katz said that while Israel also has tie-ups with South Korea and Australia, Singapore provided some unique advantages to it in Asia. Israel is the only country with which Singapore has a bi-national fund called Singapore-Israel Industrial R&D (SIIRD). The fund is jointly run by the Singapore Economic Development Board (EDB) and the Office of the Chief Scientist in Israel. SIIRD focuses on commercial R&D ventures between companies of the two nations and has to date, facilitated research investment for 70 projects worth an estimated US$73.4 million. It has also facilitated the employment of 1,100 research scientists and engineers from both nations. General Manager of SIIRD, Mr. Chan Eng Chye, reported that next year the fund is anticipated to spend USD3 million to sponsor more joint R&D projects in areas such as clean technologies, alternative energies such as fuel cell and tidal power, telematics and digital media. Contributed
by Lawrence Fong, Managing Director, GCSL Singapore |
![]() |
|
|
THE BENEFITS OF ANGUILLA The Limited Liability Companies Act 2000 is based on the original Wyoming statute. It is a simple and flexible statute which allows the members, through the use of the LLC or operating agreement, to create a custom made, special purpose vehicle. Its basic features are set out in the statute, but it is the LLC/operating agreement which gives the members the opportunity to structure the LLC to achieve their business or corporate objectives. The standard corporate documents include the certificate of formation, articles of formation, standard LLC agreement and a certificate indicating the members and their interests (if this information is decided upon and the certificate is requested).
Contributed
by Carlyle Rogers, Managing Director, GCSL Anguilla |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
BELIZE: MR. GANDHI AND THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION
Contributed
by Carlo Mason, Managing Director, GCSL Belize |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
COOK ISLANDS: GOLFING FUN IN THE SUN - GCSL TAKES TOP PRIZE The 2007 theme was Rugby World Cup, and worse still, GCSL drew the short straw and had to represent the perennial under-performers of this event – the New Zealand All Blacks. Normally it would be a proud statement to say that we support the All Blacks. But, if you followed the recent World Cup, you will understand why that support has waned considerably when the AB’s yet again choked when it mattered. For Puai Wichman who watched that quarterfinal game against France in an Irish Pub somewhere in Las Vegas, the pain was multiplied by being surrounded by ecstatic South African fans who knew at that point that the World Cup was theirs. He has needed therapy since.
However, some shoddy judging gave the prize of best costume to the team who apparently had paid the judges the most! Come to think of it, sounds a little bit like that English referee who controlled the quarter final game which saw the All Blacks early exit!!! The evening ended with festivities and the consumption of that much loved amber liquid, and included a lot of dancing on tables, led by (surprise, surprise) the GCSL team who had earned the rights to brag all night!! Next year 2008, GCSL will be hosting this annual event, which promises to be bigger and better than ever. Mark your calendars and head down to the South Pacific for a stint of Golf and some great Bone Fishing in November next year. Contributed
by Puai Wichman, Managing Director, GCSL Cook Islands |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
SAMOA: GCSL SAMOA IS ONE YEAR OLD It is hard to believe that it was only 13 months ago that Jack Flader and Puai Wichman arrived in Samoa to begin the process of licensing as a Trustee Company – a process that should have taken many months to complete. However, with gritty determination, and ample assistance from Lawyer Fiona Ey and the friendly staff at SIFA, in particular Chief Executive Erna Vaai, the GCSL Samoa dream was born. Like all start up operations, GCSL Samoa started from a simple idea. Puai Wichman as Managing Director had the unenviable task of putting it all together - in the shortest possible time. The finding of premises, hiring of staff, installation of phones, computers and broadband internet, putting in place systems and precedents, training of brand new staff, transferring of business, and then attending to renewal of 100 plus companies, had to be achieved within a month of GCSL receiving its license!!! It was a bold journey into the relative unknown for GCSL. There are many people who have contributed to our success. To our clients in particular, we pass on our eternal gratitude, for making it all happen. Without you, there would be no GCSL Samoa. We know that we both had to learn to work with each other, but after 12 months, there is no doubt that GCSL is a company that has made its presence felt in Samoa, and indeed in the offshore corporate services world. From us in Samoa, a big heartfelt Alofa and thank you to all our clients. As with all such adventures, there are many stories to tell. We have come across many people in many roles and professions both within and outside of Samoa. But the GCSL story would not be complete without reference to the “Datec Boys”, who have secured a very strong relationship with GCSL Samoa, in more ways than may be expected. These guys over the last 12 months went beyond the call of duty to provide our office with computer and IT related services. They were spending so much time at GCSL that they could almost be considered staff. At first impressions, this could be called outstanding service - beyond the call of duty (the installation and servicing of our computer systems), but on closer inspection the real story will unfold. As it turns out, the allure of our Global Girls kept these fine gentlemen at our premises way after working hours. While we certainly benefited from this relationship, the new General Manager at Datec Samoa has plenty to smile about as he scored the big prize and is now dating our Manager, Laura. GCSL expects that the IT bill for 2008 will decrease considerably!!! With 12 months under its belt, GCSL Samoa is looking to the future with much optimism. The staff members of Tai, Laura, Kuini and Fono have all gone from strength to strength. They have grown and matured with the Company. In line for the coming year are bigger and better premises to cope with the rapid growth of GCSL Samoa. Cheers to all from the happy Isles of Samoa. Contributed
by Laura Fepuleai, Manager, GCSL Samoa |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
The things that make us smile, frown and generally make life interesting... OUR
MONTHLY QUOTE THAT MADE US SMILE SOMEONE MADE SOME SERIOUS MONEY…AND TAXPAYERS GOT RIPPED OFF!!! BAH HUMBUG!!! WHATEVER HAPPENED TO UNDERSTANDING COMPANIES AND SPOUSES??? Our industrious purveyor of all things good had charged AUD12,000 for such services. The company sacked the AUD185,000 a year employee for "inappropriate and unacceptable" personal spending. The Mrs. (if such a woman exists) may have sacked him for similar charges. One assumes he won't be seeing her rack again after this publicity. LET THEM EAT CAKE TAKES ON NEW MEANING
Let them eat cake, we say…after all, who wants to eat gold and “goji berries”...whatever they are!!!??? OOPS, I FORGOT TO VOTE Kathie: "Bill, you lost." In law-speak, there is a litigation term known as "asking one question too many". Kathie then goes on to find the matrimonial political equivalent. Kathie: "And I didn't vote. Oh my God, look what I've done?" 1. Why didn't she vote? But far more importantly and the difference really between the sexes: 2. Why on earth would she admit not to voting in this situation? Imagine if this happened in the Clinton household! THE JAPANESE LOVE THE BRITS THE PHILIPPINES FOLLOWS NIGERIA “Dear Friend, I am Madam Laarni Enriquez, a native of Philippines nationality, and a divorcee. I would like to have a long lasting and confidant relationship with you, if possible entrusting my life time fortune into your possession, as now I am broken hearted and needs someone to trust, without remembering my past and forsaken experiences from close confidants and family. I need someone, who would take me for whom I am and as a life time partner, after making claims of my deposited life. All, I want from you, now is honesty and sincerity, as soon as this money is claimed by you, I will look for a way out and sneaked out of Philippines and travel down to meet you, So we can go into a life time partnership together, in investing this money in your country and anywhere else you prefer. |
|
The contents of the Global Consultants and Services Ltd's ("GCSL") Newsletter is for reference purposes only, and is provided by GCSL as a complimentary service. We have reviewed many different publications to compile this information, and we recommend that readers conduct due diligence before acting on any opinions mentioned herein. GCSL, its directors, officers, shareholders, employees, affiliates and agents do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any information made available herein. In accordance with the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, Chapter 486, of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, we hereby inform you that we will discontinue sending our newsletter to you in the event you request we do the same. |
![]() |